I’ve been posting some blog-length commentary at MeWe recently, while neglecting this site. It’s high time I hit two birds with one lemon…or make lemonade out of the bird life handed me…aw, nevermind.
The discussion was about the nearly two-decade debacle in Afghanistan, and what is required for victory there. Here’s me:
One part of the problem (and I mean JUST ONE) is the wussification of America. Up until 1945, we fought wars to win them–and winning usually meant unconditional surrender. If that entailed nuking Hiroshima and Nagasaki, or firebombing Dresden and Hamburg…so be it.
Third-worlders with primitive mindsets (which, whether you want to believe it or not, applies to most of Asia and the Middle East) respect that. You might say it’s the only thing they respect. They see restraint and mercy as weakness–and act accordingly.
(My debut novel, Hell and Gone, touches on this a bit. The first draft was written before the ground campaign in OIF kicked off.)
If you you believe some crisis or other is so important that our young men (and now young women, God help us) should be sent into a place where they will be shot at and bombed, then you better be willing to stomp the living hell out of the opposing force there–collateral damage or not. Vietcong hit and run behind the border of a neighboring country? We’re coming after them, and we might just have to deal with their sympathizers in your government who are harboring them. Cowards want to snipe at our patrols, then go hide in a Mosque? Raze that building to the ground and douse the rubble with napalm. An enemy asset is an enemy asset.
We’re dealing with people who (in Vietnam) fire on medics and use children in terrorist bombings. In the Middle East they’ll do that too, then hide behind their women and children to avoid reprisal. Hell, look at what they do to their own people. The only way to pacify a population in such places is to beat them senseless, then bash their skull in if they look like they might want to get up and fight some more.
People in the USA don’t have the stomach for what it takes to achieve victory over there (unless you redefine victory, as in Gulf War I). We’re too soft and comfortable over here, and can’t even imagine the brutality of those people–much less the barbarism that would be required to make them peaceful.
If we’re not willing to do what’s necessary to achieve victory (and we’re not), we have no business deploying troops over there. Let’s concentrate on defending our own country against the primitive third-worlders hellbent on bringing their barbarism inside our rapidly disintegrating safe haven–and the politicians committed to importing them.
I’ve never liked identity politics. Maybe you don’t either. But as much as we don’t like it, we are gonna have to deal with it, because it’s becoming more and more of a factor all the time, whether we like it or not.
Jared Taylor and Tree of Logic have a pretty interesting conversation on the topic (and many sub-topics) of race. One of the interesting points made is how every race on earth has a desperation to view (and present) themselves in a positive way–sometimes making incredible leaps of logic to do so.
…EXCEPT Caucasians. White people behave the exact opposite way–making incredible leaps of logic in order to erase any contributions white people have made to civilization.
Of course, this is paralleled in any kind of discussion about the sexes. You can only say good stuff about women; and can only say bad stuff about men. And men (white knights and manginas, that is, who count for 90% of the male population) are the most vocal man-haters.
There are two rising subcultures (with some overlap) which are defying this zeitgeist now. Both of them have problems, but it is what it is.
Got a few days off in December? Christmas isn’t what it used to be. The commie thought police are banning the Clay-Mation Rudolph classic, you can’t listen to “Baby it’s Cold Outside,” and A Christmas Story will probably come under fire next because (BB) GUN VIOLENCE! Your entertainment choices are limited to:
1) watching millionaires who get played to play football protest being victimized by this oppressive, racist country;
2) watching some “woke” holiday comedy that will probably feature a buffoonish Santa too incompetent to put the toys in his sack were it not for the strong, wise, independent (yet underappreciated) Mrs. Clause and her comedy relief BFF (a homosexual elf);
3) sink into a coma trying to digest all the GMO-laden holiday food…
OR…
4) read a good book. Here is this year’s CLFA (Conservative-Libertarian Fiction Alliance) holiday book sale.
UPDATE: Marina Fontaine (author of Chasing Freedom) just informed me: “GIFTBOOK18 code gets you $5 off $20 paperback purchase on Amazon.”
One of Vox Day’s readers relates some of his experiences in the Feminized Church:
…I remember my mother stressing that Jesus was a superior man for not defending himself and being a victim. Combine that with a weak father with strong gamma traits and you won’t be surprised that I developed the typical passive-aggressiveness of a gamma. Just to name another example: I remember attending a bible lecture as a child where the (male) member of the church community who served there as a teacher told us that women were somehow stronger than men. I don’t remember the context, I only remember my astonishment (“don’t have men naturally more strength than women?”) but somehow accepting his statement in the end.
Does that resonate with your experience?
You’re not alone if one of the reasons you don’t care for the whole church scene is because the alleged men there all strike you as effeminate wimps. Moreover, in the average church, training males to be that way is a stealth priority.
Here’s some boilerplate messages used around the western world, requiring only some humor, pop culture references, and religious language to flesh it out and dispense it from the Churchian Pulpit.
MOTHERS DAY:
Women are heroic and strong–especially single mothers. They are also morally pure and more in tune with the Holy Spirit than men are. That’s why husbands should submit to their wives. When the Bible seems to say it should be the other way around…well, you have to understand (gaslight) it doesn’t really mean what it actually says because (feminist ideals disguised as theology), (pseudo-intellectual word salad), (male-shaming anecdotes), and (muh self-sacrificing mother and muh feelz).
FATHERS DAY:
Men suck.
You don’t do enough as fathers and husbands. You don’t do enough for the church. Since you are not morally pure like women, you are living in sin–whereas women’s only sin is not thinking highly enough of themselves. Men need to understand that they are always at fault for marital problems because (anecdotes). Since women are spiritually superior, men should submit to them in all things, as to the Lord. Watch Fireproof, War Room, and other Churchian movies made in the last 20 years, and follow the same pattern of male repentance. Remember: men engage in serious sin like embezzling and porn addictions, and require female leadership to overcome. In fact, lack of submission to a woman’s superior morals and spirituality is probably what led to your sin spiral in the first place.
EVERY OTHER DAY:
Married men, you’re all a bunch of losers. Just listen to these anecdotes (tales of abuse, cheating, etc.) The wife is the important person in the relationship–act like it. If she is unfaithful, it’s justified because you failed her somehow. You don’t understand what leadership really is (not that men should be leaders, anyway). Being the king and priest of your household means giving women whatever they want at all times. And perhaps, if you live every second of your entire life exactly the way your wife wants you to, maybe she’ll feel up to rewarding you with a token gesture of respect, some sex, or even just a few minutes of civility. But don’t you dare demand any of those things–only she is allowed to make demands.
Unmarried men, you’re not married already because you’re unworthy. To become worthy, abandon your unfair desires that a woman needs to add value to your life for you to make her a permanent part of your life. You are the only one required to bring anything to the table in a relationship. She can say or do or be anything she wants to, with God’s blessing, got it? As soon as you encounter a woman who wants to use you like an ATM machine, kick you while you’re down after a hard day of work every night, and otherwise suck the life out of you, it is your obligation to step up, man up, and commit yourself to a lifetime with no escape from her (unless she decides to divorce-rape you…which will be your fault). Maybe, if you’re really fortunate, one day soon you’ll be like one of these henpecked husbands in the congregation who I berate on Sundays for their toxic masculinity. Now hurry up and get married as soon as possible!
That’s a Latin phrase which means: “Who benefits?”
Since the days when people spoke Latin, it was an important question to ask when, say, citizens of the Empire were pushed a little too hard by the Romans to swallow the latest version of The Narrative. It’s still an important question, and one you should be asking.
The latest atrocity I’m aware of (as of this writing) was the shooting at a synagogue in Pennsylvania, but it won’t surprise me if there’s already been another spectacular incident somewhere. There might be one every single day until Election Day, or until one finally impacts the pending election significantly for those who benefit.
Looking back to the Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas media circus and the subsequent “Year of the Woman” which propelled Bill Clinton into the White House, it’s probable certain interests hoped to get a “two-fer” by keeping a Constitutionalist off the Supreme Court (destroying his life in the process) while energizing the pussy-hat crowd into a Blue Wave in November, all with the same media blitz. But this time, amazingly, after they surrounded their victim and attacked him from all sides, he stood his ground and called BS on them. Neither all the King’s talkshows nor all his network news puppets could put Christine-Dumpty’s “credible” narrative back together again.
With November Six drawing closer and no Blue Wave in sight (unless you place stock in Swamp Polls and factor in massive voter fraud), the America-haters who need to remove that meddling President Trump, protect themselves from exposure and prosecution, and put our country back on the fast track to oblivion, became increasingly desperate. No “Year of the Woman” for 2018 and, to their apoplectic fury, the Supreme Court is seemingly one seat closer to being what it is supposed to be.
SOOOO-OOOOO…
Crude mock-ups of Hollywood-style time bombs were next delivered to mailboxes at addresses connected to some big-name leftists, and the Swamp Media went crazy trying to pin it on Trump’s followers. Lo and behold, they found a guy–an avowed leftist who, with convenient timing, had a sudden and miraculous conversion to the Cult of MAGA, covered his van with right-wing decals and paraded around his deep blue stomping grounds creating as big a footprint as possible. (Reminiscent of how Lee Harvey Oswald made a spectacle of himself as an anti-Kennedy zealot in the months before the JFK assassination.) Technology improves, but the playbook sticks to the same fundamentals.
But back to the question: who benefits? Or, more importantly, who was intended to benefit? A bunch of high-profile America-haters were “threatened,” but none of them were ever in danger from these “devices” that were not wired to explode. It’s not difficult to figure out what kind of reaction from the electorate the Swamp Media was hoping for, if you heard even just a fraction of their mouth-frothing coverage.
That media circus didn’t have the desired effect. Maybe actual casualties were needed. Nobody of importance to the Deep State, of course–but somebody whose demographic profile would play into the Trump-Supporters-Are-Nazis Narrative, who would be more valuable as martyrs than alive.
And so, a fake right goon (probably on prescription psychotropic drugs, if the pattern holds, and possibly with a CIA handler referred to as his “therapist”) shoots up a Synagogue, killing several people. He’s an anti-Trump national socialist, but do you suppose that kept the Swamp Media from attempting to blame the atrocity on Trump and right-wingers (who are NOT socialists)? Don’t be silly.
If this one doesn’t work, what’s next? Another school shooting? The very smelly shooting in Broward County, Florida did manage to move the needle a bit, causing Trump to entertain speculation on trips to Wishy-Washy Land and betraying his base, who had nothing to do with the shooting. Not only that, but there is documented proof of at least one terrorist camp in the USA where children have been trained to perpetrate made-to-order high-profile school shootings (few dare call them false flags). And while Paul Manafort was locked in solitary confinement without trial for improperly filling out bank forms 10 years ago, a “woke” judge let the terrorists walk on a signature bond. No perversion of justice to see here, folks. Just move along.
Maybe a run-of-the-mill school shooting won’t be enough. It might have to be an ANFO bomb murdering a bus load of black children. Oh, they’ve already taken care of that improvised munition? How about a firearm with 3D-printed parts, used to gun down some Asian valedictorians at a national awards ceremony? Hmm…why not a brutal attack on one of the “refugee” convoys being delivered to our border?
Have the manufacturers of public opinion spent their load, or do they still have an atrocity or two up their sleeve? We still have a few days to see just how imaginative they can be.
…Attempting to sucker-punch a guy who had temporarily turned his head.
Fortunately, the intended victim was not alone, and saved from the cold-cock by a comrade who flicked it aside.
Shamelessly, the chickenshit soy-boy probably went to find a more unsuspecting victim. Maybe a 70-year old woman, a WWII veteran in a wheelchair, or a blind Kindergartener. Maybe he borrowed a bike lock from his professor for next bout of peaceful activism.
This is quite illustrative of the political situation in the USA right now. Tyrannical cowards like the Antifa posterboy in this clip are desperate to take power, encouraged by their svengalis in the Swamp Media and pretty much every Democrat with a microphone. They have rigged voting machines and armies of illegal voters primed to help them acquire that power. If we don’t turn out in record numbers on November 6th, you will find out that giving these people more power doesn’t magically grant them integrity.
For those who don’t know what Q Anon is, you may read my previous post.
I’ve been following Neon Revolt’s Q decodes for a while, and sharing some of them. He’s very detailed, and goes deep, whereas a lot of Q “decodes” on Youtube are little more than somebody reading the Q drops to the camera. I don’t have time to hang around the chans and decode them myself…or even to keep up with all the coverage from the two sources I follow. So I appreciate the painstaking work that Praying Medic and Neon Revolt put into that.
NR also struck me as a decent guy, too. Maybe he is. But anyway, one day I was reading one of his posts and came across this:
He said more than I’m including here on this marathon post, so out of fairness to him, you should probably visit his site and read it all in its entirety before deciding which one of us is on the right side of what follows.
Do take note, though, that the evidence he presents that “America was built on many classically fascist principles” are fasces in historic art and sculpture, and the Latin phrase “E pluribus unum” on Federal Reserve Notes. That will prove relevant in the next screenshots from a following post of his.
So superficial connections via fasces on old artwork, and a Latin phrase, are valid evidence of America being built on many fascist principles. But superficial connections between Nazis, Fascists and Communists just don’t cut it as valid evidence. Remember this logic, because this isn’t the only way or time it is applied.
Again: NR says a lot more on the subject than I’m including here, and it’s more lucid than how the average white nationalist or Nazi apologist normally present it. BTW: I’m not saying he is either one, necessarily (though I have no doubt he’s been influenced by one or more). He even makes some good points.
Secondly, it is true that the USA has been infiltrated by collectivists (called by different labels depending on the times or political winds) and other treacherous individuals throughout our history. Some of them had infiltrated America even by the time of the Revolution–meaning they were here, influencing our government, even before the republic came into being. That’s at least one blog post all by itself, so I’ll leave it at that for now.
Thirdly…well, we’ve posted here many times about white tribalism, so I don’t want to rehash that here. But while at one point you could reliably bank on two out of every three members of any white identity group being an informant or plant from a federal agency, that seems to have begun changing during the Obama Occupation. A whole lot of Fake Right trolls probably still are paid agitators, but a lot of non-shill white folks have become tired of all the institutionalized hate against whites, and have begun listening to the white identity messages–regurgitating it everywhere they go, as if it comprises their own thoughts and opinions.
These Fake Right recruits are more and more militant about reacting to standard SJW identity politics…with a big steaming pile of their own identity politics. Together, the shills and the true believers have dedicated their lives to proving left-wing propaganda correct (that everything is about race, and the left’s political opposition subscribe to white supremacy, etc.). They’re as predictable as their SJW counterparts at introducing race into every topic–including those which have nothing to do with race.
The sad part is that some sincere people are buying into this tribalist thinking. It’s not gonna lead to anything pretty; but at this point it appears to be inevitable.
Anyway, Neon Revolt presents himself as a man who follows the truth wherever it leads. And we’re both on Gab. During a rare compulsive moment, I tagged him with a message. I don’t have a “pro” account (which allows Gabbers to write longer posts), and I’m not used to limiting myself to 300 characters, so I was forced to break some posts into parts. That, plus Gab’s display of complex threads in a visually non-linear fashion, caused me to chop certain things up in an attempt to sort it into chronological sequence here. Also, I didn’t capture all the streams that split off from the main thread (some of the comments are, frankly, incoherent).
This is a pet peeve of mine, as many readers know. There was probably a more diplomatic way to initiate a discussion. Anyway, here’s what happened next:
So at that point, I figured the conversation was over. He probably wasn’t willing to have his beliefs challenged, and that’s his prerogative. He’s got plenty of followers, of whom I was only one, so I wasn’t even banking on him replying at all. He did respond, but was pretty dismissive.
“Whatever,” sez I.
But then he replied again later, and this ensued:
Okay…asking relevant questions is revisionist and “blue pill.” And I didn’t press him on this at the time, but if he admits that both movements were funded by the same people, you’d think that knowledge, by itself, would spark his curiosity, not prompt him to gloss it over as if it’s insignificant. You’d think it would provoke questions. If the two revolutionary movements are “nowhere near the same,” why would certain people fund both of them? Who benefits from a one-two punch (or Plan A & B) like that? Presumably, two movements which are “nowhere near the same” would have radically different goals and results, yet he doesn’t find this information the slightest bit intriguing.
This was a sign that I probably had overestimated NR.
At this point I was disappointed at the knee-jerk reaction, and his lame deflection.
But speaking of “autistic screeching and bad memes,” one of his Gab sycophants decided to jump in and dazzle me with his based intellectual alacrity:
What is he mouthing off about here? What, exactly, am I being told to deal with? Absolutely nothing in this entire thread had anything to do with Q coming to /pol/. You probably think I lifted this from a different thread with a completely different conversation just to make this ankle-biter look like a fool, but I promise I didn’t. After getting no response to his first comment, he tried again later during my back-and-forth with Neon Revolt.
I wonder if guys like this really believe their input is relevant. There’s a wise old maxim that you shouldn’t argue with stupid people, because they’ll drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience. But I must admit: I’m occasionally in the right mood to engage in a battle of wits with an opponent who is unarmed.
The sad part is, looking back over the sub-threads, these ankle-biters probably do believe their petty insults really are devastating comebacks.
I don’t know why that black strip appears in some of my screenshots. Really annoying. But back to the main thread:
Again, Gab’s character limit forced me to cut off my comment, back up and finish the first part a different way. During that annoying interruption, I took a moment to reflect. This was descending into an Internet pissing contest, which was not what I intended. So I posted the following:
Neither Neon Revolt, nor his ankle-biting sycophants. ever replied to, or even acknowledged, this post. Too bad, because I was irritable later when I came back to Gab and read the replies posted while I was out in the real world:
If you’ve paid close attention, you can see that he’s subtly contradicting his earlier admission that both movements were funded by the same people (“the people behind it all”). And now he just falls deeper and deeper into his Dunning-Kruger spiral. Really disappointing. I’ve come to expect these “ready, fire, aim!” rules of engagement from most keyboard warriors on social media, but was hoping he’d be different.
His fans are probably fooled. I’m not: he didn’t answer my questions based on basic socialist principles because he can’t answer them–not without challenging the Narrative he has latched onto and is evidently quite fond of.
So after claiming that the National Socialists and International Socialists are nothing alike, he cherry-picks one of my questions to build a straw man out of, stacking up more assumptions about what I do think and don’t know. Maybe the “#BoomerPosting” hashtag he so adroitly wielded against me means he assumes I’m a baby boomer, too? Add that to the list of names I’ve been called by the Legion of Ignorance, I guess: racist; diversity bot; Nazi; kike; cuck; autist; and, of course: conspiracy nut-job.
Again, I had to split my comment up, and it makes the thread hard to follow in some places. Unlike Neon Revolt, I had kept my comments about the facts in dispute, and avoided attacking him personally in our dialog. These posts were as close as I got:
Anyway, what follows is how it ended.
Since I’m being called a baby boomer, what have I got to lose by referring to Monty Python?
So my questions were “aggressive”? Hmm. Then, after calling me plebian; oblivious to history; revisionist (based on what “concrete evidence,” I wonder?), blue-pilled; more informed by my “vague American dogma than actual research;” calling me ignorant a few more times; and declaring my criticisms are uninformed (Holy Hypocrisy, Batman!), he whines that I acted “indignant.” But wait! He’s got one more parting accusation: that I haven’t behaved like a grown adult (implying that he has, I gather). He then mutes me, suggesting that I unfollow him.
I knew going in that there was a good chance I wouldn’t be able to change his mind. I was just hoping for a little less knee-jerk and defensiveness. In fact, I had begun the task of unpacking some books and trying to track down some other misplaced resources so I could, in fact, show him the “concrete evidence” he allegedly would accept. But this is probably for the best. I can see now that he would have just dismissed it out of hand for one excuse or another and all that time and effort would have been wasted.
As it is with 99% of idealogues in the world today.
Here’s another sub-thread initiated by an ankle-biter, coincident with the other pissing contests:
I’m frequently surprised at how so many people on social media so carelessly sling out these demonstrably false accusations. And when she’s called out, the poor blowhard drops her bombshell–sentence excerpts that even somebody with only First Grade reading skills can see is not the “EXACT SAME WORDING”:
And when these people are proven wrong, there’s no remorse. They never miss a beat–just double down. I hate to acknowledge this, but some of these people on my side of the political divide behave just as irrationally as the SJWs. At least she’s learned not to hoist herself on her own petard anymore. Notice how she covers her retreat by building a (lame) insult around the fact that I typed: “Oh, I see.”
The “soyboy” remark was probably wasted ammo. She likely has already forgotten her own opening shots (because it’s too painful for her to remember how they backfired?).
BTW, her loony, desperate comment above reminds me (as do some of NR’s, to a lesser extent) of a tactic I’ve been noticing a lot on social media lately. I’ve been in quite a few flame wars online. Whether I’m engaging a Fake Right Alt-Retard on Gab, a normalcy-biased coincidence theorist on the Gateway Pundit, or a rabid SJW on Youtube, they ALL wind up accusing me of being enraged by something they said. There’s literally no reason for them to legitimately suspect that I’m frothing into a berserker rage. In fact, it’s often them who appear to be rage-posting–with name-calling tirades and irrational (if not anatomically impossible) accusations, after I’ve directed all my attention to their arguments, and haven’t speculated about them personally. And for whatever reason, their accusation is usually some variation of the rhetorical statement: “Looks like I touched a nerve, didn’t I?”
Is it as simple as just wishful thinking on their part? They’ve unleashed the most powerful insults in their arsenal, so they’re positive it has provoked an emotional reaction from their opponent? Or are they trying to instigate a self-fulfilling prophecy? Maybe they believe that provoking a tantrum out of the enemy…or, at least, selling that version of events to onlookers…is equivalent to victory, so they can save face.
Finally, here are a couple comments from one of the subthreads the conversation inspired:
I haven’t read through NR’s comment threads, so I can’t verify the first post. However, after this episode, I’m sad to say I don’t doubt it at all.
The second comment is evidently from one of the Q skeptics who likes to call us “Qtards,” “low IQAnons,” etc. But I thought he made an interesting point about NR’s double standard regarding “concrete evidence.”
Many skeptics like to accuse Q of trying to tell people what to think. I point out that he mainly asks questions and encourages people to think/research for themselves. How ironic, then, that Neon Revolt was so intimidated by my “aggressive questions.”
This was originally just going to be a short intro to a different blog post; but as often happens, it quickly got out of hand. So, I’m cutting the post in two.
In case somebody reading this blog still hasn’t heard of “Q” (or “Q Anon”) yet, here’s the Cliff’s Notes version:
After Trump became President, he dropped the phrase “calm before the storm” during a photo shoot with a crowd of mostly top military brass. Presstitutes at the event asked him what he meant by the remark, but he only replied cryptically.
Around the same period of time (I think), an anonymous poster on the chans calling himself “Q” began dropping “crumbs.” The crumbs are mysterious quatrains which sometimes prove prophetic, and sometimes seem to indicate that whoever “Q” is, it is somebody high up in government, with access to Trump.
#QAnon mostly asks questions, or mentions some information which causes others to ask questions and connect dots…though some posts are possibly coded messages for specific recipients. What many believe Q has been telling us is that Trump and some other “white hats” (good guys) have become aware of what traitors and criminals inside the government/media machine have been doing and are still doing to our country, and the world. Q tells us that Trump and the White Hats have a plan to surgically remove the Deep State from power, neutralize the Swamp Media…basically clean house in the USA and, to some extent, expose the corruption, perversity, and criminality of our domestic enemies.
This sounded too good to be true when I first heard it, but it interested me.
I was ready to dismiss the whole Q phenomenon when he urged us to “trust (Jeff) Sessions.” I wasn’t the only one: there are many Q enthusiasts, but there is also no shortage of detractors and naysayers.
Some from the former camp made plausible arguments that Sessions is playing possum while piling up thousands of sealed indictments behind the scenes, and getting all his ducks in a row to launch “The Storm” against “The Cabal” and its support structure. I resumed paying attention.
Whatever Q turns out to be (and I, for one, will probably be convinced one way or the other by the time of the midterm elections), he is giving American patriots a cause for hope we haven’t had in a long, long time. The more informed an American patriot is, the less likely they’ve had any cause for hope in their lifetime before Q. Also, Q is causing people to research and seek the truth hidden behind the Swamp Media’s lies, distractions and obfuscations. Hard to not see that as a net positive.
Not having the time, myself, to dig into the chans and decipher all of Q’s cryptic crumbs, I asked around on Gab for a good resource for decoding and summarizing Q posts. Two recommendations I got from different sources were Praying Medic on YouTube, and Neon Revolt on his own website. I’ve been following both when I have time–which isn’t too terribly often.
So now with that established, I’ll put my originally conceived content in the next post.
Paul Manafort sits in solitary confinement, facing 305 years in prison for alleged tax evasion in 2005 (for which he hasn’t been convicted as of this writing).
While this has been going on, a gang of Invaders have been training children to execute (more) false-flag school shootings, at a compound in New Mexico. At least one of the children was murdered at the compound.
Obviously the uselessness extends well beyond 2016.
The FBI has known about the group for a while, but of course did nothing. They had more important things to do, like trying to spy on, entrap, or frame American citizens, cover up their own crimes, and overturn the results of the 2016 election.
On Tuesday New Mexico Judge Sarah Backusreleased the five Islamist defendants, Siraj Wahhaj, Hujrah Wahhaj, Subhannah Wahhaj, Jany Leveille, and Lucas Morten, on a $20,000 “signature bond.”
In making her decision to release the extremists, Judge Backus accused prosecutors of anti-Muslim bias against the Islamic terror camp organizers.
And, much like at Waco, the FBI immediately sent bulldozers in to destroy the crime scene. They couldn’t be bothered to save the children (whom they are SOOOO concerned about in cases like Waco); but they wasted no time plowing over evidence after the cat got out of the bag.
Now I just wonder what could be their possible motive for this skewed set of priorities?
I ask again: Whose interests are being served in this country? Who and what do our public servants owe allegiance to? Is it We the People who pay their salaries and foot the bill for their weapons and equipment?
Red-Blooded American Men Examine Pop-Culture and the World
s, Fascists and Communists just don’t cut it as valid evidence. Remember this logic, because this isn’t the only way or time it is applied.
Secondly, it is true that the USA has been infiltrated by collectivists (called by different labels depending on the times or political winds) and other treacherous individuals throughout our history. Some of them had infiltrated America even by the time of the Revolution–meaning they were here, influencing our government, even before the republic came into being. That’s at least one blog post all by itself, so I’ll leave it at that for now.
