[avatar user=”Machine Trooper” size=”thumbnail” align=”center” link=”http://www.amazon.com/Henry-Brown/e/B004CC3LMG/ref=dp_byline_cont_pop_ebooks_1″ target=”_blank” /]
From the instant the first news flash went out that there had been a massacre in the Carolinas, some of us knew details without being told.
It was a no-brainer to call how the treasoncrats would react. Barack Hussein Obama’s predictable talking points emphasized one difference between what is left of our constitutional republic and the type of nation he is fundamentally transforming us into. (That one difference that is the toughest nut to crack for the globalists, and why they haven’t already reduced us completely into a third world police state.)
Also before hearing the details, many of us were willing to bet that the shooter was psychologically disturbed, in therapy, and on some sort of psychotropic drugs. This is a consistent pattern in these media circus shooting sprees. They all have remarkably similar vulnerabilities and…to put it cautiously, seem to be marching to the beat of the same drum.
Now I’m going to be a little less cautious.
The hysterical voices that hype stories like these (while suppressing others) are not worried in the least about guns in the hands of violent criminals, Mexican drug cartels rampaging inside our borders, or sociopaths like these high-profile shooters. It is law-abiding Americans who mind their own business that they so desperately want to disarm. That is the toughest nut to crack for the enemies of our freedom.
In the elections of 1994, anti-gun leftists in Congress suffered the worst political spanking since Reconstruction. The very next year saw the Oklahoma City Bombing, and a seeming epidemic of school shootings has punctuated media coverage of celebrity sexcapades and Oprah Winfrey’s diets ever since.
Despite the catastrophic “progress” made on every other front, the would-be serfs in America tend to be less gullible when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms. Efforts to disarm us have mostly been stymied. The Hussein Administration has been executing a flanking attack by going after ammunition, but that’s not working fast enough for them. And for all the hype about the shootings, some Americans insist on “clinging to their guns and religion.”
Guns and religion–that symbolizes an unofficial coalition between evangelical Christians and constitutionalists that has proven a foil to the designs of the globalists.
We’ve seen divide-and-conquer implemented effectively along racial lines since 2008. And with regards to the invasion on our southern border, a fissure was seen to form between churchgoers and patriots. How can that fracture be exploited and widened?
By shootings in churches instead of schools. Watch for droves of churchians jumping onto the anti-gun bandwagon soon.
And it was a white shooter with black victims, of course. So that motive for division isn’t over, by a long shot.
The thing that most infuriates the treasoncrats – as you call them – is that whenever there is this “random” mass shooting, the general public want to arm themselves even more. I don’t know if it is a lack of imagination on the part of the ‘crats or a sign of desperation, but they clearly misjudge the general public’s response. The best that they’ve been able to do is get people to ‘dis the Confederate flag. But they still want their guns. The tyrants may yet be successful, but eventually they may start to use real force. The big question is, whose side will most of the police and military be on: the tyrants or the people?
That is the big question, for sure.
Which is why Hussein has been purging the military of commanders who would honor their oaths.
Another major deciding factor is if the 3% take action…at the right time. Even among gun owners, there are a whole lot of sheep who would rather bend over, and hope the scorpion doesn’t sting them on the other side of the river.
Granted, the police never were “Andy Griffith” and “Barney Miller”. (Although my cousin, who has been in LE for decades once told me that of all the cop shows, “Barney Miller” was the most realistic.) But it seems like the newest generation of police are either (a) dimwitted ‘roided up meatheads or (b) some pipsqueak minority or woman, who by virtue of their diminutive size, are afraid of their own shadows and so are apt to be over confrontational. Am I wrong?
There’s a lot of truth in your assessment. Where I would quibble is just to note that some of the ‘roided up meatheads are minorities, too. And the beer-bellied, donut-devouring, Napoleon Complex cops with chips on their shoulders also transcend race and ethnicity.
Cops who actually serve and protect have nearly all been replaced by power-tripping Nuremburg fodder–federal, state, and even local. The hearts and minds of our public servants have been turned against the citizens.
I know I’m risking the “Shameless Self-Promotion” stigma here, but this very situation is one I tried to illustrate in my latest novel. There are a couple good cops who take their oaths seriously, but most are amoral, career-serving pragmatists who get off on power…some with a latent sadistic streak. That’s honestly how I see it.
That modern police officer you describe is also slow-witted and, at heart, cowardly unless the odds are overwhelmingly in his favor, in which case he is sadistic and authoritarian. But if there is civil unrest and he is ordered to side against the patriotic, law abiding citizens, those qualities can be used to the advantage of the citizens.
I’ve tried to make that point, too.
I’m reminded of a discussion in a military history class long ago. The context was the Eastern Front but it could apply to any occupation:
What determines the allegiance of the ovine populace is cost. One key task of the resistance is to make sure it costs more to collaborate than resist.
One of Jim Morris’s anecdotes about Vietnam illustrates this quite well:
Two Viet Cong passed through a village with sympathies that leaned toward the American occupiers and the freedom they promised. Villagers reported the movement to the ARVN, who could have grabbed the VC easily, probably without a fight. But this timely intelligence got filtered through the bureacracy. A week later, after the VC were LONG gone, that bureacracy finally acted on that intelligence: fast movers bombed the village, turning every survivor into a life-long VC sympathizer.